The Role of Women In The U.S. Military Research Paper

The type of Women In The U.S. Military - Research Paper ExampleThey were first introduced in military in knowledge domain War I (1914-1918). Initially, the women did serve the military as nurses and too did a number of clerical jobs. later World War II, they were given permanent positions in US military under the Women Armed run Integration Act, 1948. However, they were restricted to only 2% of the total US military. They were also not allowed higher positions of Generals in troops. In 1978, female auxiliaries found in military branches were abolished by Congress and integrated forces were created for the first time. Women were also allowed to take part in many jobs other than those of healthcare and technicians. However, they were still restricted to be include in combat positions. The need of inclusion of women in combat positions was first recognized after the disconnectedness war in 1991. The women supported the armed forces on combat positions in the war. This brought the women to front lines. Their impressive and terrible services in the war gave ground for the Defense Department of America to reconsider the ban impose on the women to be included for combat positions. In 1993, the women were allowed to render their services on combat warships and aircrafts. legion(predicate) military female officers welcomed the alterations. However, critics were of the view that these changes would damage the fighting ability of US forces. However, despite all criticism, more and more women were included for combat positions of US military. During Serbian conflict of 1999, women served as combat pilots in US Air force. Women were took part in Navy combat positions. However, during Iraq War, when two female Johnson and Lynch were captured, a turn regarding women services on combat positions started again. The role of women in US military for technical and healthcare jobs is grateful for every bingle. However, the deployment of women on combat positions is sti ll a controversial issue. There are two view points, one that supports the deployment of women on combat positions and other that opposed such deployment. Both have their own arguments supporting their stand. DEPLOYMENT OF WOMEN FOR armed combat POSITIONS IS ACCEPTABLE SUPPORTERS VIEWS The critics of women inclusion in combat points argue that the gender-integration of military will damage the morale of the women. This is the alike argument which was made before when the US military was being integrated after the long segregation of whole military on racial basis. However, it is noticed later on that the racial integration of the army did not decrease the morale of the army. The same is the case with the inclusion of women for combat roles. The supporters argue that it is just a vague argument that the gender-desegregation of military will reduce the morale and efficiency of the military just as made previously about racial-desegregation of army. The supporters also criticize the point that women are physically weaker than men naturally. It is received but in non-physical attributes, women are as much stronger as men are. They are psychologically stronger than men. However, many psychologists say that women are subjected to mental disorder same like men. Gender-integration may bring some lordly effects on the overall performance of military. It increases the professional standards level of military and also brings cohesion which is by no means defective or less effective than found among men. So, there is no agent to believe that gender-desegregated units on combat positi